亚洲中字慕日产2020,大陆极品少妇内射AAAAAA,无码av大香线蕉伊人久久,久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆网站

資訊專欄INFORMATION COLUMN

MySQL 死鎖套路:一次詭異的批量插入死鎖問(wèn)題分析

afishhhhh / 866人閱讀

摘要:線上最近出現(xiàn)了批量的死鎖,百思不得姐。死鎖記錄如下第一反應(yīng)是批量,的順序不一樣導(dǎo)致的死鎖。什么是隱式鎖隱式鎖的意思就是沒(méi)有鎖在插入記錄時(shí),是不加鎖的。

線上最近出現(xiàn)了批量insert的死鎖,百思不得姐。死鎖記錄如下

2018-10-26T11:04:41.759589Z 8530809 [Note] InnoDB: 
*** (1) TRANSACTION:

TRANSACTION 1202026765, ACTIVE 0 sec inserting
mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
LOCK WAIT 3 lock struct(s), heap size 1136, 3 row lock(s), undo log entries 1
MySQL thread id 8532863, OS thread handle 139858337453824, query id 16231472122 10.111.10.143 seewo update
INSERT IGNORE INTO xx_performance_type_label_relation(label_id, performance_type_id, type, create_time)
    VALUES
      
      ("bb0394e670644168a998a93a3ed521bc", "06b96ee0bab84d71bb17bf9645d3aa54", 1, now())
     , 
      ("bb0394e670644168a998a93a3ed521bc", "27d82e2331b241e1a9c9c0a74ec21099", -1, now())
     , 
      ("bb0394e670644168a998a93a3ed521bc", "3100b5978fb24f56b327d25732a7d7a7", 1, now())
     , 
      ("bb0394e670644168a998a93a3ed521bc", "435a1e19ce6e4e5bbb84240b3b34cf03", 1, now())
     , 
      ("bb0394e670644168a998a93a3ed521bc", "447fe27199ca40e289ef2834469d9a78", 1, now())
     , 
      ("bb0394e670644168a998a93a3ed521bc", "87a52c4d00844b5bb9eb75e8fe34202a", 1, now())
     , 
      ("bb0394e670644168a998a93a3ed521bc", "c6a0e26983bd4fae837d5ee2f4efeef8", 1, now())
2018-10-26T11:04:41.759635Z 8530809 [Note] InnoDB: *** (1) WAITING FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:

RECORD LOCKS space id 505 page no 9912 n bits 288 index uk_performance_type_id_label_id of table `masaike`.`xx_performance_type_label_relation` trx id 1202026765 lock_mode X locks gap before rec insert intention waiting
2018-10-26T11:04:41.759674Z 8530809 [Note] InnoDB: *** (2) TRANSACTION:

TRANSACTION 1202026764, ACTIVE 0 sec inserting
mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
3 lock struct(s), heap size 1136, 3 row lock(s), undo log entries 1
MySQL thread id 8530809, OS thread handle 139858469242624, query id 16231472119 10.111.10.153 seewo update
INSERT IGNORE INTO xx_performance_type_label_relation(label_id, performance_type_id, type, create_time)
    VALUES
      
      ("bb0394e670644168a998a93a3ed521bc", "06b96ee0bab84d71bb17bf9645d3aa54", 1, now())
     , 
      ("bb0394e670644168a998a93a3ed521bc", "27d82e2331b241e1a9c9c0a74ec21099", -1, now())
     , 
      ("bb0394e670644168a998a93a3ed521bc", "3100b5978fb24f56b327d25732a7d7a7", 1, now())
     , 
      ("bb0394e670644168a998a93a3ed521bc", "435a1e19ce6e4e5bbb84240b3b34cf03", 1, now())
     , 
      ("bb0394e670644168a998a93a3ed521bc", "447fe27199ca40e289ef2834469d9a78", 1, now())
     , 
      ("bb0394e670644168a998a93a3ed521bc", "87a52c4d00844b5bb9eb75e8fe34202a", 1, now())
     , 
      ("bb0394e670644168a998a93a3ed521bc", "c6a0e26983bd4fae837d5ee2f4efeef8", 1, now())
2018-10-26T11:04:41.759713Z 8530809 [Note] InnoDB: *** (2) HOLDS THE LOCK(S):

RECORD LOCKS space id 505 page no 9912 n bits 288 index uk_performance_type_id_label_id of table `masaike`.`xx_performance_type_label_relation` trx id 1202026764 lock mode S
2018-10-26T11:04:41.759753Z 8530809 [Note] InnoDB: *** (2) WAITING FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:

RECORD LOCKS space id 505 page no 9912 n bits 288 index uk_performance_type_id_label_id of table `masaike`.`xx_performance_type_label_relation` trx id 1202026764 lock_mode X locks gap before rec insert intention waiting
2018-10-26T11:04:41.759784Z 8530809 [Note] InnoDB: *** WE ROLL BACK TRANSACTION (2)

第一反應(yīng)是批量insert,insert的順序不一樣導(dǎo)致的死鎖。但是這個(gè)在這里是不成立的。原因有兩點(diǎn)

    出現(xiàn)問(wèn)題的批量插入SQL中順序是一模一樣的,在順序一樣的情況下,只會(huì)進(jìn)行插入等待(implicit lock轉(zhuǎn)explicit X鎖)下面有實(shí)驗(yàn)

    如果是因?yàn)榕坎迦腠樞虿灰恢聨?lái)的死鎖日志,打印的結(jié)果不是等待插入意向鎖(insert intention waiting),下面有實(shí)驗(yàn)

現(xiàn)在采用一個(gè)簡(jiǎn)化的表,做實(shí)驗(yàn)

CREATE TABLE `t1` (
  `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `a` varchar(5)  NOT NULL DEFAULT "",
  `b` varchar(5)  NOT NULL DEFAULT "",
  PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
  UNIQUE KEY `uk_name` (`a`,`b`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB;
實(shí)驗(yàn) 01

在記錄不存在的情況下,兩個(gè)同樣順序的批量insert同時(shí)執(zhí)行,第二個(gè)會(huì)進(jìn)行鎖等待狀態(tài)

首先truncate t1;

t1 t2
begin; begin;
insert ignore into t1(a, b)values("1", "1"); 成功
insert ignore into t1(a, b)values("1", "1"); 鎖等待狀態(tài)

可以看到目前鎖的狀態(tài)

mysql> select * from information_schema.innodb_locks;
+-------------+-------------+-----------+-----------+------------+------------+------------+-----------+----------+-----------+
| lock_id     | lock_trx_id | lock_mode | lock_type | lock_table | lock_index | lock_space | lock_page | lock_rec | lock_data |
+-------------+-------------+-----------+-----------+------------+------------+------------+-----------+----------+-----------+
| 31AE:54:4:2 | 31AE        | S         | RECORD    | `d1`.`t1`  | `uk_name`  |         54 |         4 |        2 | "1", "1"  |
| 31AD:54:4:2 | 31AD        | X         | RECORD    | `d1`.`t1`  | `uk_name`  |         54 |         4 |        2 | "1", "1"  |
+-------------+-------------+-----------+-----------+------------+------------+------------+-----------+----------+-----------+

在我們執(zhí)行事務(wù)t1的insert時(shí),沒(méi)有在任何鎖的斷點(diǎn)處出現(xiàn),這跟MySQL插入的原理有關(guān)系

insert 加的是隱式鎖。什么是隱式鎖?隱式鎖的意思就是沒(méi)有鎖

在t1插入記錄時(shí),是不加鎖的。這個(gè)時(shí)候事務(wù)t1還未提交的情況下,事務(wù)t2嘗試插入的時(shí)候,發(fā)現(xiàn)有這條記錄,t2嘗試獲取S鎖,會(huì)判定記錄上的事務(wù)id是否活躍,如果活躍的話,說(shuō)明事務(wù)未結(jié)束,會(huì)幫t1把它的隱式鎖提升為顯式鎖(X鎖)

源碼如下

t2獲取S鎖的結(jié)果:DB_LOCK_WAIT

實(shí)驗(yàn)02

批量插入順序不一致的導(dǎo)致的死鎖日志不是等待插入意向鎖

t1 t2
begin
insert into t1(a, b)values("1", "1"); 成功
insert into t1(a, b)values("2", "2"); 成功
insert into t1(a, b)values("2", "2"); t1嘗試獲取S鎖,把t2的隱式鎖提升為顯式X鎖,進(jìn)入DB_LOCK_WAIT
insert into t1(a, b)values("1", "1"); t2嘗試獲取S鎖,把t1的隱式鎖提升為顯式X鎖,產(chǎn)生死鎖
------------------------
LATEST DETECTED DEADLOCK
------------------------
181101  9:48:36
*** (1) TRANSACTION:
TRANSACTION 3309, ACTIVE 215 sec inserting
mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
LOCK WAIT 3 lock struct(s), heap size 376, 2 row lock(s), undo log entries 2
MySQL thread id 2, OS thread handle 0x70000a845000, query id 58 localhost root update
insert into t1(a, b)values("2", "2")
*** (1) WAITING FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:
RECORD LOCKS space id 55 page no 4 n bits 72 index `uk_name` of table `d1`.`t1` trx id 3309 lock mode S waiting
Record lock, heap no 3 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 3; compact format; info bits 0
 0: len 1; hex 32; asc 2;;
 1: len 1; hex 32; asc 2;;
 2: len 4; hex 80000002; asc     ;;

*** (2) TRANSACTION:
TRANSACTION 330A, ACTIVE 163 sec inserting
mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
3 lock struct(s), heap size 376, 2 row lock(s), undo log entries 2
MySQL thread id 3, OS thread handle 0x70000a888000, query id 59 localhost root update
insert into t1(a, b)values("1", "1")
*** (2) HOLDS THE LOCK(S):
RECORD LOCKS space id 55 page no 4 n bits 72 index `uk_name` of table `d1`.`t1` trx id 330A lock_mode X locks rec but not gap
Record lock, heap no 3 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 3; compact format; info bits 0
 0: len 1; hex 32; asc 2;;
 1: len 1; hex 32; asc 2;;
 2: len 4; hex 80000002; asc     ;;

*** (2) WAITING FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:
RECORD LOCKS space id 55 page no 4 n bits 72 index `uk_name` of table `d1`.`t1` trx id 330A lock mode S waiting
Record lock, heap no 2 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 3; compact format; info bits 0
 0: len 1; hex 31; asc 1;;
 1: len 1; hex 31; asc 1;;
 2: len 4; hex 80000001; asc     ;;

*** WE ROLL BACK TRANSACTION (2)

到目前為止,已經(jīng)陷入了僵局,完全沒(méi)法復(fù)現(xiàn)死鎖的情況。看了代碼,發(fā)現(xiàn)在insert之前有一個(gè)delete,但是delete與insert不在一個(gè)事務(wù)里面,也就是delete提交以后,才進(jìn)行批量insert,真正出問(wèn)題的地方在批量insert的地方。一開(kāi)始就排除了delete對(duì)后面的影響,難道不在一個(gè)事務(wù),也會(huì)有影響?

寫(xiě)了一個(gè)代碼去模擬,有很大概率會(huì)復(fù)現(xiàn)

fun test() {
    dao.delete() // 對(duì)應(yīng)delete from
    // sleep for 10ms
    dao.insert() // 對(duì)應(yīng)insert ignore
}

對(duì)應(yīng)的 SQL 如下,注意是兩個(gè)事務(wù)

begin;
delete from t1 where a = "25"
commit;

begin;
INSERT ignore INTO `t1` (`a`, `b`) VALUES("25","1")
commit;

這個(gè)代碼在兩個(gè)線程同時(shí)調(diào)用的時(shí)候,非常容易死鎖。

后來(lái)翻遍了網(wǎng)上相關(guān)的死鎖案例,有一個(gè)關(guān)于purge刪除的過(guò)程可能跟這個(gè)有關(guān)系。

如果標(biāo)記為刪除,說(shuō)明事務(wù)已經(jīng)提交,還沒(méi)來(lái)得及 purge,這時(shí)后面的事務(wù)加S鎖等待;

在源碼中打印一些日志。 1.在storage/innobase/row/row0ins.crow_ins_set_shared_rec_lock增加日志,可以看到對(duì)唯一索引增加S鎖的過(guò)程

if (dict_index_is_clust(index)) {
    err = lock_clust_rec_read_check_and_lock(
        0, block, rec, index, offsets, LOCK_S, type, thr);
} else {
    err = lock_sec_rec_read_check_and_lock(
        0, block, rec, index, offsets, LOCK_S, type, thr);
    // 增加如下日志
    fprintf(stderr, "row_ins_set_shared_rec_lock %s %lu %d
" , index->name, type, err);
}

2.在lock_rec_enqueue_waiting增加日志,可以看到鎖等待的情況

static
enum db_err
lock_rec_enqueue_waiting(
{
	fprintf(stderr, "lock_rec_enqueue_waiting::::: %s %lu
" , index->name, type_mode);
}

日志大概如下

row_ins_set_shared_rec_lock uk_name 0 9 (t1獲取S鎖成功)
row_ins_set_shared_rec_lock uk_name 0 9 (t2獲取S鎖成功)

lock_rec_enqueue_waiting::::: uk_name 2563(t1 X鎖進(jìn)如鎖等待)
lock_rec_enqueue_waiting::::: uk_name 2563(t2 X鎖進(jìn)如鎖等待)

其中2563=2048+512+3=LOCK_INSERT_INTENTION+LOCK_GAP+LOCK_X

這個(gè)過(guò)程跟非常經(jīng)典的三個(gè)事務(wù)同時(shí)insert,一個(gè)回滾,剩下的兩個(gè)事務(wù)一個(gè)成功,一個(gè)死鎖,其實(shí)是一模一樣的原理。

實(shí)驗(yàn)03

三個(gè) insert ignore,一個(gè)回滾造成的死鎖

insert語(yǔ)句都是insert ignore into t1(a, b)values("1", "1");以下省略

t1 t2 t3 備注
begin begin begin
insert 成功
insert 把t1的隱式鎖提升為X鎖,t2進(jìn)入進(jìn)入S鎖等待
insert t3進(jìn)入進(jìn)入S鎖等待
rollback; t1回滾以后,釋放X鎖,t2和t3同時(shí)拿到了S鎖
ok deadlock t2和t3都想拿插入意向鎖X鎖,造成死鎖條件

死鎖日志,跟我們案例中的一模一樣

------------------------
LATEST DETECTED DEADLOCK
------------------------
181101 23:22:59
*** (1) TRANSACTION:
TRANSACTION 5032, ACTIVE 11 sec inserting
mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
LOCK WAIT 4 lock struct(s), heap size 1248, 2 row lock(s), undo log entries 1
MySQL thread id 5, OS thread handle 0x70000d736000, query id 125 localhost root update
insert ignore into t1(a, b)values("1", "1")
*** (1) WAITING FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:
RECORD LOCKS space id 56 page no 4 n bits 584 index `uk_name` of table `d1`.`t1` trx id 5032 lock_mode X locks gap before rec insert intention waiting
Record lock, heap no 139 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 3; compact format; info bits 0
 0: len 3; hex 313031; asc 101;;
 1: len 3; hex 313031; asc 101;;
 2: len 4; hex 800007b1; asc     ;;

*** (2) TRANSACTION:
TRANSACTION 5033, ACTIVE 6 sec inserting
mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
4 lock struct(s), heap size 1248, 2 row lock(s), undo log entries 1
MySQL thread id 6, OS thread handle 0x70000d779000, query id 126 localhost root update
insert ignore into t1(a, b)values("1", "1")
*** (2) HOLDS THE LOCK(S):
RECORD LOCKS space id 56 page no 4 n bits 584 index `uk_name` of table `d1`.`t1` trx id 5033 lock mode S locks gap before rec
Record lock, heap no 139 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 3; compact format; info bits 0
 0: len 3; hex 313031; asc 101;;
 1: len 3; hex 313031; asc 101;;
 2: len 4; hex 800007b1; asc     ;;

*** (2) WAITING FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:
RECORD LOCKS space id 56 page no 4 n bits 584 index `uk_name` of table `d1`.`t1` trx id 5033 lock_mode X locks gap before rec insert intention waiting
Record lock, heap no 139 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 3; compact format; info bits 0
 0: len 3; hex 313031; asc 101;;
 1: len 3; hex 313031; asc 101;;
 2: len 4; hex 800007b1; asc     ;;

*** WE ROLL BACK TRANSACTION (2)

目前來(lái)看,得到的結(jié)論是:

一個(gè)已提交但是未purge掉的記錄會(huì)造成后續(xù)插入獲取S共享鎖,兩個(gè)事務(wù)同時(shí)獲取S鎖,然后嘗試獲取插入意向鎖,造成死鎖

網(wǎng)上大神梳理的insert流程

首先對(duì)插入的間隙加插入意向鎖(Insert Intension Locks)

如果該間隙已被加上了 GAP 鎖或 Next-Key 鎖,則加鎖失敗進(jìn)入等待;

如果沒(méi)有,則加鎖成功,表示可以插入;

然后判斷插入記錄是否有唯一鍵,如果有,則進(jìn)行唯一性約束檢查

如果不存在相同鍵值,則完成插入

如果存在相同鍵值,則判斷該鍵值是否加鎖

如果沒(méi)有鎖, 判斷該記錄是否被標(biāo)記為刪除

如果標(biāo)記為刪除,說(shuō)明事務(wù)已經(jīng)提交,還沒(méi)來(lái)得及 purge,這時(shí)加 S 鎖等待;

如果沒(méi)有標(biāo)記刪除,則報(bào) 1062 duplicate key 錯(cuò)誤;

如果有鎖,說(shuō)明該記錄正在處理(新增、刪除或更新),且事務(wù)還未提交,加 S 鎖等待;

插入記錄并對(duì)記錄加 X 記錄鎖;

上面是我 debug 源碼得到的一些結(jié)論,如果我的理解有誤的話,記得留言告訴我

以下為參考文檔

www.aneasystone.com/archives/20…

www.aneasystone.com/archives/20…

hedengcheng.com/");

文章版權(quán)歸作者所有,未經(jīng)允許請(qǐng)勿轉(zhuǎn)載,若此文章存在違規(guī)行為,您可以聯(lián)系管理員刪除。

轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明本文地址:http://www.ezyhdfw.cn/yun/7869.html

相關(guān)文章

  • MySQL 死鎖套路:唯一索引下批量插入順序不一致

    摘要:死鎖的本質(zhì)是資源競(jìng)爭(zhēng),批量插入如果順序不一致很容易導(dǎo)致死鎖,我們來(lái)分析一下這個(gè)情況。為了方便演示,把批量插入改寫(xiě)為了多條。死鎖的本質(zhì)是資源競(jìng)爭(zhēng),批量插入如果順序不一致很容易導(dǎo)致死鎖,我們來(lái)分析一下這個(gè)情況。為了方便演示,把批量插入改寫(xiě)為了多條 insert。 先來(lái)做幾個(gè)小實(shí)驗(yàn),簡(jiǎn)化的表結(jié)構(gòu)如下 CREATE TABLE `t1` ( `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_...

    toddmark 評(píng)論0 收藏0
  • 為什么開(kāi)發(fā)人員必須要了解數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)鎖?

    摘要:小明馬上開(kāi)發(fā)完畢,成功上線。下班過(guò)后,小明回想大紅說(shuō)的話,什么是間隙鎖,什么是插入意向鎖,看來(lái)作為開(kāi)發(fā)者對(duì)數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)不應(yīng)該只會(huì)寫(xiě)啊,不然遇到一些疑難雜癥完全沒(méi)法解決啊。破壞了數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)中的隔離性。 1.鎖? 1.1何為鎖 鎖在現(xiàn)實(shí)中的意義為:封閉的器物,以鑰匙或暗碼開(kāi)啟。在計(jì)算機(jī)中的鎖一般用來(lái)管理對(duì)共享資源的并發(fā)訪問(wèn),比如我們java同學(xué)熟悉的Lock,synchronized等都是我們常見(jiàn)的...

    AbnerMing 評(píng)論0 收藏0

發(fā)表評(píng)論

0條評(píng)論

最新活動(dòng)
閱讀需要支付1元查看
<